2025 Supreme Court of India Latest Judgments on Maintenance
Supreme Court of India — Latest Maintenance Judgments (2025)
Principles from 2025 Judgments
1. Jurisprudence on Interim Maintenance
-
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that interim or ad-interim maintenance can and should be granted during the pendency of matrimonial or family disputes to ensure immediate relief.
-
The starting point for maintenance — whether from the date of application or date of order — remains a matter of judicial discretion. However, courts have consistently leaned toward granting maintenance from the date of the application to prevent undue hardship.
-
The Court emphasized that delay in disposal of maintenance applications must be avoided, and that judicial discretion must be exercised promptly to safeguard dependents.
2. Legal Framework and Judicial Discretion
-
Under Section 125 CrPC, courts have the discretion to award maintenance either from the date of the application or the date of the order.
-
The Court reiterated that maintenance proceedings are social justice measures, not adversarial disputes.
-
Courts have condemned delays in adjudication, stressing that maintenance matters must be prioritized given their direct impact on livelihood and dignity.
3. Quantum and Calculation of Maintenance
-
The Court outlined a comprehensive framework for determining the amount of maintenance, factoring in:
-
Financial status and earning capacity of both parties.
-
Educational qualifications and employability.
-
Standard of living enjoyed during the marriage.
-
Duration of marriage and conduct of the parties.
-
Responsibilities toward children and dependents.
-
-
Inflation and cost-of-living adjustments were also recognized — for example, periodic increases (such as 5% every two years) were directed in some cases.
-
Ad-interim maintenance can be ordered to prevent immediate financial distress, even before final adjudication.
Notable 2025 Supreme Court Judgments
1. Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (12 February 2025, 2025 INSC 197)
Subject: Maintenance in void marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Key Holdings:
-
Even if a marriage is declared void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), the spouse may still claim interim (Section 24) or permanent alimony (Section 25).
-
The relief is discretionary and depends on conduct, need, and capacity.
-
Maintenance under the HMA operates independently of Section 125 CrPC.
-
A void marriage does not automatically extinguish maintenance rights.
Takeaway:
Maintenance can be granted in void marriages to ensure fairness and prevent financial destitution.
2. Rina Kumari v. Dinesh Kumar Mahto & Anr. (10 January 2025)
Subject: Entitlement to maintenance despite refusal to cohabit.
Key Holdings:
-
Proceedings under Section 125 CrPC are civil in nature, designed to prevent destitution.
-
A wife’s refusal to live with her husband does not automatically disqualify her from maintenance if she has valid reasons (e.g., cruelty, insecurity).
-
The Court reaffirmed that maintenance is a right, not a reward for marital compliance.
Takeaway:
The right to maintenance is not lost merely due to non-cohabitation if the refusal is justified.
3. ABC v. XYZ (2025 INSC 129)
Subject: Maintenance claim from a second husband despite a subsisting first marriage.
Key Holdings:
-
A woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC from her second husband, even if her first marriage was technically subsisting.
-
The term “wife” under Section 125 must be interpreted liberally to include women who entered into marriage in good faith.
-
The Court adopted a social welfare interpretation, prioritizing protection against destitution over technical legality.
Takeaway:
The protective scope of maintenance extends to women in good faith relationships, not just legally valid marriages.
4. M.V. Leelavathi v. Dr. C.R. Swamy (18 August 2025)
Subject: Determination of quantum of alimony.
Key Holdings:
-
Maintenance should secure the dependent spouse a standard of living comparable to the matrimonial home.
-
Courts must consider earning capacity, not just current income.
-
Even a qualified but unemployed wife may receive a substantial one-time settlement, balancing her potential to earn and her immediate need for security.
Takeaway:
The aim is long-term financial stability for the dependent spouse, with realistic recognition of both parties’ means.
5. Rakhi Sadhukhan v. Raja Sadhukhan (29 May 2025)
Subject: Calculation and adjustment of maintenance.
Key Holdings:
-
Maintenance of ₹50,000 per month with 5% biennial increase was upheld to account for inflation.
-
The Court emphasized that maintenance orders should remain dynamic and equitable, reflecting changing circumstances.
Takeaway:
Courts can provide inflation-linked or progressive maintenance to ensure continued adequacy of support.
6. March 26, 2025 Ruling (Unnamed Case)
Subject: Effective date and payment compliance.
Key Holdings:
-
The Supreme Court directed a husband to pay ₹10,000 per month from the date of filing of the maintenance application.
-
The Court reaffirmed that arrears must be cleared within a stipulated time, and procedural delays do not erase obligations.
Takeaway:
Maintenance generally begins from the date of application, and arrears must be cleared regardless of procedural delays.
4. Broader Judicial Guidelines (2025)
-
Maintenance is a social obligation, not a punitive measure.
-
Financial independence of women must be encouraged, but dependency during transition deserves legal protection.
-
Courts must adopt a holistic approach, considering conduct, capacity, and the dignity of the dependent spouse.
-
Overlapping claims under HMA, CrPC, and the Domestic Violence Act are permitted, but double benefits must be avoided.
-
The Court reiterated its commitment to speedy and effective relief in maintenance matters.
The Supreme Court’s 2025 jurisprudence shows a consistent move toward:
-
Granting maintenance from the date of the application.
-
Ensuring quick interim relief.
-
Recognizing maintenance rights even in void or irregular marriages.
-
Promoting fair and gender-sensitive adjudication grounded in social welfare.
